Re: (PMOD) Feedback on ComOS 3.9B22?

Tony Morgan (tmorg@clnk.com)
Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:21:05 -0500

I agree, this list has been almost dead since it's release. I too, depend on
my PM3s since it's all I use. I currently have 5 and will be ordering
something (not sure if it'll be a PM3) before Christmas.
I'm really unsure about any of the upgrades due to problems with past
upgrades and any troublesome modems we've all had to deal with, mainly the
HCF modems of all makes and models.
It's difficult to even sign up a new customer that's using a brand new
machine with the HCF modem 'cause I know they're gonna be unhappy, and my
competitors don't seem to be having this problem, but then again they don't
use PM3s. We've lost at least 50 customers maybe more due to modem
incompatibilities.

( sorry, didn't mean to rant)

Tony Morgan
admin@clnk.com
Cyberlink Internet Access

----- Original Message -----
From: Brad Martin <bradleyd@iglou.com>
To: <portmaster-modems@livingston.com>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 8:02 PM
Subject: (PMOD) Feedback on ComOS 3.9B22?

> The list has been relatively quiet about the results of using ComOS 3.9b22
> as it regards modem issues. I know what the release notes say about what
> has been improved. I want to know what users think. Specifically, does
> anybody know if this new release does anything to help the Motorola SM56
> modems (if anything can help them)? I don't know that I want to go to the
> beta yet. We're small, and our PM3 runs a majority of our lines; I don't
> want to make things worse than they are. Any thoughts? I am assuming
> there is no way in Hell there's gong to be a ComOS 3.8something with just
> the new modem code? I think we've established that fact?
>
> Brad Martin
> bradleyd@iglou.com
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-modems' in the body of the message.
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-modems' in the body of the message.