> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 95 20:44:14 PDT
> From: Herb Weiner <herbw@wiskit.com>
> To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: Re: average PM uptime
>
> Hmmm. An uptime of well over a year probably means they're still running
> release 2.4, or thereabouts (unless there's some way I haven't heard about
> to install new software without rebooting the PortMaster :-) ). Could it be
> that release 2.4 was more robust than more recent releases?
Actually, 1 year ago our PM's shipped with 3.0.4
uptimes don't mean much to me. I count # of unscheduled downtimes.
Our PM's have NEVER crashed where they were unsuable EVER!. I have
stayed current with the ComOS releases so I did have to reboot but that
is scheduled. I don't think I have ever had a PM reboot its self. I have
not had ANY complaints from our customers
So, I have been very happy with my livingston PM.
I've found that Livingston release software is out of the box more stable
than anything ascend can come up with...
-Matt
-Matthew S Crocker "The mask, given time, comes
matthew@crocker.com to be the face itself." -anonymous
*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*OS/2*
*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*linux*