On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, Carl Payne wrote:
> >
> > No - the PM will only fail over to its secondary security server if
> > the primary fails to respond at all. It won't fail over if the
> > primary naks the request. Interesting idea, though...
>
> Interesting /_IDEA_/ ???
>
> I can think of a dozen reasons why this would be extremely cool. In fact,
> I'd pay real money if Portmasters and Radius did this very thing.
>
> I bet you get a flood of concurrence.
>
>
> Carl
>