> First of all...this is really goofy (IMHO). "I want a default route, but
> not for these networks" Then why call it a default route?
Because it covers everything ELSE?
> IMHO, it
> would be much better to implement BGP4, blow away the default route
> completely, and viola' you get Network Unreachable messages.
BGP4 would cost you a lot more memory than a nondefault feature.
> If
> Livingston went through the trouble to implement a "nondefault" command,
> I would laugh histerically at them for wasting so much effort, and I
> imagine that many other customers would be greatly pissed off for
> wasting engineering resources doing this.
Point. You're not exactly going to have many high-bandwidth connections to
nowhere.
> If you're *that* anal retentive about things, then my suggestion would
> be to get into another field of work. :)
Yeah, right. I burned all my neural paths already. When the fall of
civilization comes I'm going to be food.