Re: Multilink PPP vs V.120 (fwd)
Jon Lusky (lusky2@earth.voyageronline.net)
Fri, 7 Jun 1996 08:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
E. Todd Taylor writes:
> I would also like to add, that you can do PPP in two fashions with ISDN -
> either set your ISDN gear for async-to-sync PPP (and if possible MP to
> get 2 B channels), or V.120 and do what you always did with your now
> defunct analog modems, which in both cases will get you up to a 64K
> ISDN sync connection to us (and don't forget that we auto-detect either
> style of connection, so there is nothing that you need to do to make
> it work on our end).
(I asked about this a loooooong time ago, but never got any response...)
Has anything been done about the poor V.120 performance on the PM?
I consistantly get approx 5.4K/s transfer rates with V.120, and 7.3K/s
with PPP. Equipment on my side is a Linux box with a bitsurfr. I got
pretty consistant 7.0K/s doing V.120 with a UTA220k on an async port
of a PM before switching to the BRI cards.