Re: Getting the status of a Portmaster (fwd)

Jacob Suter (jsuter@intrastar.net)
Tue, 11 Jun 1996 17:23:47 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Monte Ohrt: "Radius detail file problem"
Previous message: Fred Condo: "High ethernet collision rate on OR-U"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "Getting the status of a Portmaster (fwd)"
Next in thread: MegaZone: "Re: Getting the status of a Portmaster (fwd)"

> actually... the best thing they could do is to offer v.34 "digital
> modems"... they will be upgradeable to 33.6 etc etc that way... a source
> said that the new box they are throwing out has a 486-66 and a digital
> modem solution. it will also handle one or two PRI and modems on all
> channels and not just 3/4's of the channels like some current solutions...
> it should also be the sizeish of an irx... how's that for port density...

Well, something like that with the size of an IRX sounds like fire (or a lot of burnouts)
waiting to happen.

Next message: Monte Ohrt: "Radius detail file problem"
Previous message: Fred Condo: "High ethernet collision rate on OR-U"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "Getting the status of a Portmaster (fwd)"
Next in thread: MegaZone: "Re: Getting the status of a Portmaster (fwd)"