That sounds a bit thin. It's not like Livinston would be distributing
executables they'd never even seen the source code to, eh?
> 2. The addition of backdoors in supposibly "legit" releases. Pretty easy to correct if you JUST get
> the release data from LIVINGSTON, and compile it at your own risk.
>
> 3. support hassles (easily corrected - "we don't support that OS or self-compiled stuff, its juet there
> for your convienience")
Hmm, you mean like thit ESVA-radius hellbeast, sent here to destroy us all? :)
(kidding, Leo. Smoochies from us all)
> 4. hiding something (aren't we all?)
>
> 8^)
Wait! I'm formulating an X-files episode....
-- Dan D'Ambrosio velcro@pobox.com