Re: True Dedicated ISDN supported?

Support (support@cyg.net)
Sat, 22 Jun 1996 20:29:09 -0400

At 07:42 PM 6/22/96 -0400, you wrote:
>Alex writes:
>> Yeah but even though the portmaster can route you need to take into
consideration all it has for processing
>> power is a 486 40 MHZ cpu compared to the risc proccessors the Ascends have.

I thought they shipped with a 386 40Mhz. Have they been upgraded to the 486???

>
>Gee, guess that means my Cisco 250x's aren't real routers because they
>only have 25Mhz 68030's? :)
>
>> The portmaster is what is is a
>> port server not a router. So if you think he will be getting all kinds of
routes from everywhere then you are
>> better off using a dedicated router, but dont take my word for it.
>
>If he's got large routing tables, he'll want a better routing protocol than
>RIP, and last I looked Ascend only did RIP (albeit v2).
>
>Anyway, if he just needs to route a couple of BRI's, none of this really
>matters. Just about anything should have adequate CPU to handle that,
>and routing protocols aren't a big problem. On a larger scale they should
>be a significant concern, but not for several BRI's (I think the original
>question was about just 1 BRI). My biggest concern would be the reliability
>of the equipment.

We have been using the Livingston OR-U into a 2ER with a 5BRI and it
performs great. With Multilink PPP and use of the High Water mark the OR-U
has been connected now for three months solid. Large routing tables and RIP
is doing just fine.

Huge
>
>
>
>
>
|==================================================================|
| CygNet Tech Support 24 Hours 416-812-2765 |
| Office 519-272-0451 |
| |
| "No the CD-Rom drive is not a coffee holder!!!! |
===================================================================|