Re: PM-3 vs MAX 4002

Frank Heinzius (frimp@mms.de)
Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:40:17 +0000

Ho!

On 11 Sep 96 at 14:26, MegaZone wrote:

> I picked the 4002 because it is the closest MAX to the PM-3 - 2 PRI
>

[...]

> So the MAX 4002 seems more comparable to a PM-3 than the RA6300. The MAX
> has features/baggage that the PM-3 doesn't - we don't have all those expansion
> cards to turn a PM-3 into a video conferencing system, hub router (they have
> V.35 and T1 port cards), or BRI cards. Interestingly to me, the BRI cards
> and modem cards take the same slots, so it looks like using BRI reduces the
> number of modems. It isn't clear that you can use the built in modems with
> users coming in on BRI, but I'll give them the doubt on that one.

A major point is that the BRI-channels support digital leased lines
(D64S or D128S), that means "hardwired" BRI-connection (without
D-channel signalling). A major must for ISPs especially in Germany.
This feature is an RFE from our site since we started the 5BRI/OR-ST
beta. The lack of digital leased line made many of our potential
customers go Cisco or Ascend...

(Yes, I know, I'm getting on everybody nerves at Livingston with this
RFE ;-)))

Frank

--
***** The expressed opinions are totally mine! *****
Frank M. Heinzius             MMS Communication GmbH
frimp@mms.de                  Eiffestrasse 598
http://www.mms.de             20537 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 40 211105-0        Fax: +49 40 210 32 210
***** U.S.Robotics and Livingston Distributor  *****