Does Cisco understand netmask tables? (fwd)
MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Mon, 16 Sep 1996 19:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Once upon a time John W. Temples shaped the electrons to say...
>route tables showed a host route on a subnet boundary for each PM. And if
>I did a traceroute from the Cisco to a dialup user on a particular PM, the
>Cisco went straight to the correct PM, without having a static route to a
>"gateway" PM.
>
>Routing is on on all PMs, and I've verified proxy ARP isn't being used
>(the Cisco doesn't have ARP entries for any PM dialup users), and the
>Cisco doesn't have host routes for dialup users either.
>
>How is this working?
Voodoo?
Off the top of my head, I have no idea.
-MZ
--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/>
Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
See me in person: Internet Expo, Boston, MA, October 16-17, Booth 422 ;-)