> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 21:25:16 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Bryan Wann_Stigler_ISP <bcasey@galaxy.galstar.com>
> To: "Paul G. Szabady" <pszabady@pagesz.net>
> Subject: Re: Additional PM2E-30
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 1996, Paul G. Szabady wrote:
>
> > I'm getting ready to install a 2nd terminal server and was wondering:
> > Is there an efficiency difference or problem with either running them
> > in parallel to the hub (via 10baseT) or would it better to daisy chain
> > them via ethernet and then to the hub via 10baseT?
>
> Huh? Daisy chain? If you're talking about a bus topology:
>
> [========T============T============T===]
> | | |
> Portmaster Portmaster Router
>
> it won't make any performance difference, either way. Best way is to run
> them to a 10BaseT hub, so if a segment is cut, it doesn't take down the
> whole network.
>
Ok, so I now have my 2 PM's in parallel going to the hub via 10baseT.
I've set up the 2nd one (or so I thought) so that the IP address pool
starts at 208.194.157.65 (and of course all the various server info)
yet when I try to dial in, I'm not getting authenticated. Is there
something special I need to do to radius to tell it there's 2 PM's?
This is what the radius log looks like:
Thu Oct 3 20:52:01 1996
Acct-Session-Id = "00000000"
Client-Id = 208.194.157.10
Acct-Status-Type = Start
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
Thu Oct 3 22:41:51 1996
Acct-Session-Id = "00000000"
Client-Id = 208.194.157.10
Acct-Status-Type = Stop
Acct-Session-Time = 0
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
Any suggestions?
--Paul
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
* - Wise men learn more from fools, than fools from the wise! - *
* *
* Paul G. Szabady (919) 363-1000 Voice *
* PAGESZ.net (919) 363-1010 Fax *
* Cary, NC USA (919) 363-1492 Dial-up *
* pszabady@pagesz.net http://www.pagesz.net *
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*