> > Framed-Address = xxx.yyy.zzz.65,
> > Framed-Route = "xxx.yyy.zzz.64 xxx.yyy.zzz.65 1",
> > Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.224
> >
> > But I was unable to reach any host on that subnet from the PM itself,
> > and when doing a traceroute to a host, the PM directed packets towards
> > its gateway, so it didn't even know what to do with them.
>
> Did you put the netmask in the netmask tables for all of your
> routers(applicable if you are using RIP)?
Yes, the PM had the proper netmask table entry, and my gateway Cisco
had a static route for the /24 pointing at the PM. All the /27s out of
that /24 were connected to that same PM, so I didn't bother updating
the netmask table on other PMs. In the above case, .65 was reachable,
and the Cisco directed packets for .66 towards the PM as expected, but
the PM threw them right back at the Cisco.
-- John W. Temples, III || Providing the first public access Internet Gulfnet Kuwait || site in the Arabian Gulf region