Re: ISDN with BitSurfr

Bill Lutton (whl@pageplus.com)
Tue, 22 Oct 1996 22:53:08 GMT

On Tue, 22 Oct 1996 15:50:25 EDT, you wrote:
> Well, I bought one of those TC-200-S6-1 cards (16650 UART, 460Kb max =
DTE) to

Glad to hear the card is working out.

> All-in-all, I was able to increase my NetPipes (a raw TCP stream =
connection)
>throughput from 9.1KB/sec to 10KB/sec by moving to the higher DTE. This=
still
>isn't the 14KB/sec FTP times my friend with a pair of Ciscos reports =
over his
>ISDN line.

Is it possible to try an FTP download from a server at your ISP?
You should get >15000 Bytes/sec.

> Maybe the Cisco is doing compression.

Maybe, but not req to see 15000 B/s.

> Maybe I have some stupid arguments to pppd.

Dunno.

> Maybe the BitSurfr isn't terribly good at saturating either link.

I think it is ok.

> Maybe the PortMaster isn't terribly good at saturating either link.

It is definitely ok -- I get 15238 B/s with a number of TAs.

> Maybe that's near the theoretical limit of an ISDN connection after =
you
>factor in the TCP overhead.

Nope. =20

> Maybe I have exposed inefficiencies in Linux's software.

Maybe. My experience has only been with Win95.

> Maybe BellSouth's switch isn't really giving me 128Kb.

Maybe. Make sure you include the BSPro command (manual not handy)
to request a 64K call. Some firmware revisions have defaulted to 56K.

> Maybe "dd" isn't efficient at spewing/slurping data (but it's good for
>counting out bytes from /dev/zeros).

Dunno. I've always used FTP downloads.

Hope this helps,
Bill