Re: MPPP: PM vs NT4 (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:56:47 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: MegaZone: "A Livingston default modem string is bad for a USR modem (fwd)"
Previous message: Carl Oppedahl: "A Livingston default modem string is bad for a USR modem"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "MPPP: PM vs NT4 (fwd)"

Once upon a time Jacob Suter shaped the electrons to say...
>> We do *not* support MP on analog lines. ONLY ISDN.
>Oh F***, I have told two customers now we could analog MLPPP them.

We're considering MP on analog for the PM-3. But I don't believe you'll
see it in the PM-2 or PM-25. MP does a lot of buffering, and the ISDN
cards have local memory for that. The analog units don't. The design is
older than MP.

>So, will good ol' pppd 2.2.0 do it?

On Linux? It should.

-MZ

--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway  #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566

Next message: MegaZone: "A Livingston default modem string is bad for a USR modem (fwd)"
Previous message: Carl Oppedahl: "A Livingston default modem string is bad for a USR modem"
Maybe in reply to: MegaZone: "MPPP: PM vs NT4 (fwd)"