Re: RJ-48C?

Jason Marshall (marshalj@spots.ab.ca)
Thu, 12 Dec 1996 09:39:08 -0700 (MST)

> I would think with the protocol involved (T1), having all that signaling in
> one small connector (RJ-45/RJ-48C) would be a serious problem... TCP/IP may
> not get too bent when its gotta wait for an abort error retry, but those
> analog customers are gonna BITCH.

Keep in mind that these aren't real T1's -- they're HDSL, which is
apparently a LOT less picky than a traditional T1. Both our "T1"'s came
in on the same 4-pair cable (but are broken out into two RJ-45
connectors). They're HDSL.

Definately DO tell the telco what you require, though. If they whine, ask
them if they've ever heard the phrase "tough shit". If they aren't going
to do it to your spec, then no one will.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Jason Marshall, marshalj@spots.ab.ca. Spots InterConnect, Inc. Calgary, AB |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-