So the OR's ether0 is 192.168.1.1
>a CISCO router (194.224.0.1) That is the Internet access router).
>The OR-U (192.168.1.1) has defined like WATEWAY the 194.224.0.1 (CISCO).
You CANNOT have a gateway on the OR of 194.224.0.1 if the ether0 is 192.168.1.1
The default route/gateway must be on the same subnet as ether0 or the OR
will not be able to see it.
>QUESTION: When I make a telnet to the OR-U router (192.168.1.1) I can not
>ping to the 194.224.0.1 nor 194.224.0.x. (Telnet.....)The OR says NO answer.
>Why? 194.224.0.1 is the default wateway of the OR-U!!
If the gateway is not on the same subnet as ether0 then it is invisible.
PortMasters can only ARP for hosts on the same subnet/network as ether0.
Hint: When you have routing isses, traceroute is better than ping in locating
the problem.
>2-We have two OR-U routers on two different network. 192.168.1.1 and
>192.168.200.1 <---OR=B4s IP.
>I want to allow any PC from OFFICE 1 (192.168.1.x) connect to A server that
>is on the other site (192.168.200.1). We have programmed the Routers.
>Defining on the User table and location table always a user o location with
>a specified IP that is always the remote site. For example if we are on the
>192.168.1.1 OR we program the user and location with a specified
>IP=3D192.168.200.1 (The orther OR) That seems to be right.
>On the other hand when a person calls to the OR using a ISDN card the OR
>test his name and password agains its User table and gives him a IP that is
>on the same network. Why?
>For example when anyone wants to connect to internet he must have a Internet
>IP, so why in the first case we enter the remote IP and now an IP that is on
>the same network that is the OR.
>Could you explain me it?
I really don't understand what you are asking.
Location tables and dialin users are two different worlds, they are not
related.
If you have an OR dialing an OR you can do PPP unnumbered. So OR 1 will
have a location table with the destination IP being the ether0 of OR 2.
And if OR 2 has a location table to dial OR 1, the destination IP should be
ether0 of OR 1.
When a remote user dials in they must have an IP. This doesn't have to be
from the same network as the OR. However, if will greatly simplify
routing when it is. YOU control the IP the user gets, you can make it
whatever you want. But you need to make sure it can be routed on your
network ok.
>3- Has anyone experience in Netware IP?. Netware IP is a soft that allow
>putting the novell server with and IP and allow access it with tcp/IP.
>I had many problems with IPX and now I want to test the same but with IP.
Sorry, I've never seen it.
>4- Had anyone problems with two OR accessing ON-demand?
I am working from home right now with an OR-U on my LAN connecting to a PM-3
in the office. It is no different from OR to OR. And I have worked on such
connections, they work fine.
-MZ
-- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588