ISDN Calls
64000 - 9.6%
56000 - 94.4%
Analog calls
33600 - 0.06%
31200 - 0.06%
28800 - 13.40%
26400 - 34.02%
24000 - 9.75%
21600 - 5.17%
19200 - 1.07%
16800 - 0.25%
14400 - 25.32%
12000 - 0.48%
9600 - 0.31%
7200 - 0.05%
4800 - 0.31%
2400 - 9.75%
We returned a USR TC because it did not support the only available
protocol, NI-2, at the time of installation, and because when configured on
a channelized T1 it offered similar results for analog callers. Which
vendor has the stuff?
What are list members seeing on USR TC?
What are list members seeing on Ascend?
What are list members seeing on Livingston PM3?
What are list members seeing on the Cisco?
Thanks,
Larry Vaden
Internet Texoma, Inc.
---30---
At 01:31 AM 12/16/96 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Jay meant 72 modems, not 96.
>
>On Mon, 16 Dec 1996 valder@erols.com wrote:
>
>> Avi Freedman wrote:
>> >
>> > Hmm, Erols has about 40 (from a rough count) 4004s w/ 72 modems.
>> > Wonder what they use...
>> > Justin?
>> >
>> > Avi
>> >
>> > > BULLSHIT. This is a flat out lie Kevin. A Max4004 won't run any OS
>> > > _BUT_ 4.6, so if you buy a 4004 with 72modems you are SOL.
>> > >
>> > > |I'ld agree with that. There are versions that have been around for
a while
>> > > |that don't show this problem, and the lastest incremental release
also should
>> > > |not have these random slow-downs.
>> > >
>> > > Maybe so, but who wants to *ALPHA* test software for Ascend? You
>> > > aren't even paying me remember? Hire some more engineers and test your
>> > > products yourself.
>> > >
>> > > Jonah
>> >
>>
>> We have about 200 4004 Maxes with 96 modems... we use 46bp28. So far
>> it's the most stable.. 4.6C sucks ass so we dont even bother using. And
>> we never have gotten 33.6 out of ANY of the ascends. We even had our
>> onsite ascend 'engineer' try and he couldnt even do it.
>> go figure.
>> Jay.
>>
>> ============================== ISP Mailing List
==============================
>> Email ``unsubscribe'' to inet-access-request@earth.com to be removed.
>> If the thread changes topics, change the subject.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>============================== ISP Mailing List
==============================
>Email ``unsubscribe'' to inet-access-request@earth.com to be removed.
>Think carefully about your reply -- is private email more approriate?
>
>