> > I'll restate my question...why doesn't the PM do any of the decoding that
> > Bill Lutton's decoder script does? I had no idea what was in the output
> > from debug 0x51...I just remembered it dumps lots of info that often leads
> > to solving the problem.
>
> Overhead.
Well...then perhaps they should have spent a bit more on the CPU or
actually run those AMD 386-33's at their rated speed. Don't they run them
at 25mhz instead?
> > Are there clear instructions somewhere on setting up a pm2 to dial into a
> > pm2, authenticate with PAP, and act as the Internet gateway for the
> > originating pm2's network?
>
> No.
It's kind of ironic that it should be far easier to get a Linux box to
dial into a PM than it is to get a PM to dial into another PM. I wonder
if someone at Livingston would be willing to talk us through it since we
are trying to get 2 Livingston products to talk after all. Of course, I'm
sort of biased, and am happier with the linux box anyway. If they had a
BRI card in their PM it would be a different story...but with them using
the BSpro, I doubt the PM will do any better than the linux box...if as
well.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______