On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
>
> I disagree, the PM-3 is not substantially different than the other
> Portmasters. In fact, with the imminent release of ComOS 3.5 for
> PM-2s, ORs and IRX, they will be much closer. Plus developments for
> the PM-3 may give inklings of modifications that could be done on the
> PM-2's to give them an all-digital upgrade path. I would hate to have
> to monitor yet another mailing list.
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, B. Southwick wrote:
>
> > I second Andrews motion :)
> >
> > Andrew Fried wrote:
> > >
> > > I wanted to offer a suggestion to Livingston support - now that the PM3 is
> > > out and generating a substantial amount of traffic on the portmaster-users
> > > list, perhaps it would be benefical to create two separate and distinct
> > > lists. One generic list (portmaster-users) could be kept for all support
> > > issues excluding the PM3, while the new list (portmaster-users-PM3) would
> > > be created specifically for the PM3.
>