On Thu, 1 May 1997, HAL 9000 #3 wrote:
> > Ummm.... I believe the answer to the question would be:
> >
> > set syslog
> > show syslog
>
> Well, I'll be damned! Thanks, I had no idea you could do that. That
> must be newish, it doesn't seem to be documented in the doc set I have.
> Sorry...