> 205.229.60.0 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 4 masks
> O E2 205.229.60.16 255.255.255.248
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.28 255.255.255.254
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.30 255.255.255.255
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.24 255.255.255.252
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.4 255.255.255.252
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.1 255.255.255.255
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.2 255.255.255.254
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
> O E2 205.229.60.8 255.255.255.248
> [110/2] via 205.229.48.10, 00:00:32, Ethernet0
The effect you are looking at is, more graphically:
.1 -------- /32
.2 \_______ /31
.3 /
.4 \
.5 \______ /30
.6 /
.7 /
.8 \
.9 \
.10 \
.11 \____ /29
.12 /
.13 /
.14 /
.15 /
.16 \
.17 \
.18 \
.19 \____ /29
.20 /
.21 /
.22 /
.23 /
.24 \
.25 \______ /30
.26 /
.27 /
.28 \_______ /31
.29 /
.30 -------- /32
The routes above are covering 30 addresses, not 32. If you are really
troubled by all these routes (even though they are persistant), increase
the pool size to 32 and align it so a single /27 can cover it. It's
nothing to worry about, I actually think the best-fit algorithm is kinda
cute.
Curtis
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There is an exception to every - Curtis Coleman, - (204) 985-9025
rule, except this one." . - Telenetworkputerologist - Pangea.CA Inc.