dan jacobs
On Wed, 14 May 1997, HAL 9000 #3 wrote:
> > Ouch. One of your tech people told me 60NS, so that is what I tracked down
> > and ordered. I asked her if she was sure, and she said yes. Does
> [clip]
> > > We need 70ns or faster - so yes, 70ns is fine.
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> 60 nanoseconds is faster than 70 nanoseconds.
>
> You'll be fine.
>
> --G.
> --
> 'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves | Benjamin D. Hutchins, texaport minion
> Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: | Livingston Enterprises, Inc.
> All mimsy were the borogoves, | BellNet 800-458-9966 FAX 510-737-2110
> And the mome raths outgrabe. -><- | http://www.livingston.com/ S.I.G.
>
Daniel Jacobs | @wizard.com - Las Vegas Providers of Internet Services
(702) 871-4461 | http://www.wizard.com/ | danielj@wizard.com
"In art and dream, may you proceed with abandon.
In life, may you proceed with balance and stealth." - Patti Smith