> On Tue, 27 May 1997, Brian Elfert wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is true. It's based on ComOS 3.1.4. USR's continued use of
> > code based on Livingston code was the reason Livingston sued USR last
> > fall.
>
> Why? Because they did not stick to the terms of the licence? Which is
> what? Maintain the same compatibility as Livingston?
Their license expired and they didn't renew it at first.
> Sounds like they dont know what the heck they are doing. Does the Total
Have they ever? :)
> Control do a lot more than the PM 3?
No.
- Steve
- Systems Manager
- Community Internet Access, Inc.
- Gallup and Grants, New Mexico