Re: FR versus ISDN

Gary McKinney (gmckinney@megabits.net)
Fri, 30 May 1997 07:10:59 -0400

I'll add some figures to this:

Frame Relay POP site: 60 Miles away -

4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 7.643/7.671/7.712 ms

Frame Relay Internet Port connection from provider: 85 miles away -
and it is crossing through a INI...

4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 8.196/8.652/8.847 ms

Both of these virtual connections are on one physical interface.
We are running a full newsfeed, several commercial accounts (one at 512K
and 2 at 256K) and our dialup pool (50 lines expanding next week to 75
lines) through a FR T-1 link and we have not saturated the link yet
(although we are getting close - looks like a second link in the near
future <grin> ).

Gary McKinney, Megabits Online Systems Administrator
gmckinney@megabits.net http://www.megabits.net (407) 453-5900

----------
> From: Stephen Fisher <lithium@cia-g.com>
> To: Arnaud Girsch <girsch@marben.com>
> Cc: jake@ams.com; johnk@bwcoop.com; MOORERR@msu.edu;
portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: Re: FR versus ISDN
> Date: Friday, May 30, 1997 1:58 AM
>
>
> Frame-Relay T1 to site 150 miles away:
>
> 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 11.662/16.609/25.846 ms
>
> Frame-Relay 56k to site a few miles away (but it has to go about 10 miles
> to and from the switch):
>
> 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 49.046/49.448/49.779 ms
>
> How does ISDN measure up to this?
>
> On Thu, 29 May 1997, Arnaud Girsch wrote:
>
> > I experienced a very slow latency over ISDN ... An established
> > connection between two sites, 300 miles, PacBell - AT&T - GTE, has
about
> > 130ms for 40bytes packets .... I found that a little bit slow. I
didn't
> > have the exact same config with FR, but I think this is a little bit
> > faster (someone else can comment ?)
>