> Patrick Kormann wrote:
>
> > Still nobody has been able to explain to me, how this message can occur.
> > Our config looks like this:
> >
> > Assigned Address: 212.254.24.135 (Pool Size 60) (that's
> > the machine that produced this message most often)
> >
> > show c0:
> > Port Type: Login Login (Security)
> >
> > Why the heck should we run out of assigned addresses?
>
> By chance are you running MCPPP across multiple PMs and is this one near the
> front of the hunt group? They only way I could think this could happen is
> that if the first channel gets it's address from PM #1 and the slave channel
> comes in on PM #2 because PM #1 is full. The User then hangs up Channel #1
> on PM #1 but leaves Channel #2 up. Now the Second Channel on PM#2 is using
> one of PM #1 address. Another use now comes in on PM #1 on the only free
> channel but the IP address is still in use by a V port.
wow nasty thought... that IP address pools may have to be increased to
account for MCPPP? 8(
Patrick, can you do a sh ses and see if c0 is assigned an ip?
If it has one, then for sure the PM thinks it needs 61 ips instead of 60.
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>