> By the way, I own an US Robotics v.everything and an US Robotics Sportster
> ISDN by myself. Both are unusable with the PM3.
> The v.everything just retrains and renegotiates when connected with v.90
> (and that on an anlog port of an ISDN line!) and the Sportster ISDN doesn't
> get higher than about 2.5-4 Kbyte/s. Which protocol you take doesn't matter
> (v.120, x.75, ppp).
> I'd rather see lucent fixing things like this *quickly* than pointing out
> such benchmarks. Of course, other NASes have problems as well, and yes, with
> another modem we might have won. But that's really not very comforting if
> you're the only one out of 15 tested providers that has such severe line
> problems!
I can comment on ISDN on the PM3 and it is wonderful. If you connect with
a reasonable TA like an OR-U you get full bandwidth and more if you have
the stac card in the unit. I don't see how you could have anything but a
glowing review of ISDN unless there is something different about the way
it is done by your telco. I have never seen anyone use V.120 or x.75 and
really don't know what they are.
I have the same complaints as everyone else about the modem code and keep
wondering when there will be a better release for use on CT-1.
Doug Ingraham You can judge the quality of your life by how often
Rapid City, SD you notice the enjoyment of the little things.
USA
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>