> In the original posting, he said he needed 48 addresses, so that's what my
> reply was based on. You're quite correct about E1, of course. I left it
> out because it wasn't relevant to his application.
OK, I was just following up to make sure I had got it right myself. I'm
about to get another NAS which means I'll need to use OSPF to handle my
static IP address customers. Problem is that my portmaster seems to be
announcing it's OSPF routes in small chunks (like on the 48 port system
you described), instead of announcing the pool as one /26 subnet:
My pool:
195.89.132.129 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 32
195.89.132.130 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 31
195.89.132.132 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 30
195.89.132.136 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 29
195.89.132.144 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 28
195.89.132.160 195.89.132.67 0x80002d59 No Yes 1659 27
195.89.132.175 195.89.132.67 0x80000743 No Yes 1659 28
My statics:
195.89.132.192 195.89.132.67 0x80002d59 No Yes 1659 32
195.89.132.195 195.89.132.67 0x80002d69 No Yes 42 32
195.89.132.196 195.89.132.67 0x80002d69 No Yes 292 32
195.89.132.201 195.89.132.67 0x80002d6a No Yes 3851 32
I only set the pool size a few weeks ago (it was unset before that) and I
haven't rebooted since. Do you think I'll have to reboot to get it to
route the pool as one /26?
Regards,
-- Richard Morrell richard@ednet.co.uk System Administrator - edNET: Internet Access for Edinburgh - www.ednet.co.uk
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>