RE: (PM) AMI vs B8ZS (fwd)
Butch Kemper (kemper@tstar.net)
Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:07:51 -0600
At 06:18 PM 3/27/99 , you wrote:
>Once upon a time Kevin Sawyer shaped the electrons to say...
>>a ESF/B8ZS and several clear-channel Ts which are also ESF/B8ZS. However, I
>>just added a CT1 at a remote POP where PRI isn't available and it is
>>configured D4/AMI. Is D4/AMI supposedly the "best" or "only"
>>framing/linecoding for CT1s?
>
>No - you can get T1s with B8ZS/ESF instead of AMI/D4(SF). In fact, if you
>are given a choice I would pick the former.
What are the technical benefits of B8ZS/ESF over AMI/D4?
Butch
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>