Re: (PM) AMI vs B8ZS

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:51:18 -0600 (CST)

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Ed Schulz wrote:

:You're right about B8ZS, but I'm still not sure what you're trying to say
:about being "robbed of bits." Even with AMI line coding for mu law voice,

Okay so there is a bit cost. 8-) I got a bad description regarding B8Zs a
couple years ago and kept hanging on to that...

So anyway... the ANSWER IS!!! Get B8ZS for your portmaseter 3 and youll get
better service.

:If you use ISDN PRI access, then you must use B8ZS for clear-channel data,
:and that access link will not have the RBS impairment. But even then,
:V.90 calls to your PortMaster might traverse multiple hops with RBS.

This is why I equated AMI/D4 T1 versus PRI with B8ZS as being bit robbed,
because of the need to have a clear channel for PRI.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware

Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>