Normally DMS100's work fine.
Gerry
At 11:14 AM 3/31/99 -0600, Bradley Urberg Carlson wrote:
>I'm working in a new territory that is served by a DMS100RSC. A
>representative of the LEC claims that they've had problems before with
>CT1s provisioned from this remote, and ISP customers have been unable to
>receive V.90 calls. The LEC rep blamed this on the way DS0s are carried
>over the umbilical between the switch and the remote. Does anyone know if
>the DMS100RSC uses an umbilical that does not preserve the DS0s' PCM from
>the CPE (my terminal server) to the switch (their DMS100)? Perhaps the
>umbilical uses a SLC-like umbilical. Or maybe the DMS100RSC can only
>produce a CT1 by feeding DS0's through an external channel bank?
>
>-Bradley Urberg Carlson
>MRNet
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>