>From what I understand, it was some trade-in deal with Cisco.
---Mike
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
>To: Jason Slagle <raistlin@tacorp.net>
>Cc: <portmaster-users@livingston.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 1:14 AM
>Subject: (PM) only a handful of people upset with modem performance. was Re:
>(PM) performance study
>
>
>> At 11:50 PM 4/1/99 , Jason Slagle wrote:
>> >If they work so much better, go buy one. The whining is really getting
>> >kind of old. Out of the several thousand pm3's out there, I only see
>> >whining from a handful of people. Maybe that should be a clue.
>>
>> Actually, we might just do that. I heard a large ISP in Toronto (idirect)
>> just dumped all of their PM3s (close to 100 of them) for Ciscos. We are
>> waiting for an eval unit to see for ourselves how they perform. If the
>> 'whining' is getting old, its perhaps because Lucent needs to get better
>> modem code out faster. What do you suggest, that if people have problems
>> with their gear they say nothing to the vendor ?
>>
>> ---Mike
>> **********************************************************************
>> Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net
>> Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike
>> Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400
>> Canada *
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>
>
**********************************************************************
Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike
Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400
Canada *
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>