Re: (PM) only a handful of people upset with modem performance. was Re: (PM) performance study

Mia's Virtual Post Office (list@mia.net)
Fri, 2 Apr 99 19:31:24 -0600

Mike Tancsa said:

>At 12:50 PM 4/2/99 , Mia's Virtual Post Office wrote:
>>Mike Tancsa said:
>>
>>>At 08:46 AM 4/2/99 , Todd Young wrote:
>>>>I would like to find out how to buy their 100 or so PM3's?
>>>> Todd
>>>
>>>From what I understand, it was some trade-in deal with Cisco.
>>>
>>So I take it when they have problems, or are unhappy with their Cisco
>>gear, they will just trade them up for 3-COM?
>
>Sometimes the time comes when it is necessary to do this-- i.e. drop old
>technology that is not meeting ones needs and move onto better technology
>that does meet ones needs. Or are you still using C-64s ? If I find that
>product X is better than my existing product Y, and I understand the costs
>of dumping Y and moving to X do not outweigh the benefit of moving to X,
>then hello X, here I come.
>

So are you comparing the PM3 to the Commodore 64? I don't understand the
analogy. The C64's were worthless when they came out, that's why I
bought an Apple and TSR-80's instead. The PM3 seems to fullfill our
needs, but at the same token I have older equipment around here that I
still use. I rarely dump anything, I just recycle it somewhere else.

jer

"On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony." And Windows98 Crashed!

COMPAQ Class Action Law Suit: http://members.aol.com/CClass450/index.htm

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>