Re: (PM) only a handful of people upset with modem
Mike Tancsa (mike@sentex.net)
Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:50:47 -0500
At 08:31 PM 4/2/99 , Mia's Virtual Post Office wrote:
>Mike Tancsa said:
>
>>At 12:50 PM 4/2/99 , Mia's Virtual Post Office wrote:
>>>Mike Tancsa said:
>>>
>>>>At 08:46 AM 4/2/99 , Todd Young wrote:
>>>>>I would like to find out how to buy their 100 or so PM3's?
>>>>> Todd
>>>>
>>>>From what I understand, it was some trade-in deal with Cisco.
>>>>
>>>So I take it when they have problems, or are unhappy with their Cisco
>>>gear, they will just trade them up for 3-COM?
>>
>>Sometimes the time comes when it is necessary to do this-- i.e. drop old
>>technology that is not meeting ones needs and move onto better technology
>>that does meet ones needs. Or are you still using C-64s ? If I find that
>>product X is better than my existing product Y, and I understand the costs
>>of dumping Y and moving to X do not outweigh the benefit of moving to X,
>>then hello X, here I come.
>>
>
>So are you comparing the PM3 to the Commodore 64? I don't understand the
No. The point is, sometimes you have to move on to new gear. Personally,
I would love it if we could stick with the PM3s. It just seems that with
respect to modem performance, the Lucent gear *seems* to be behind the rest
of the pack, and continues to stay one step behind. Hopefully I will have
a better sense of it after evaluating the Cisco gear.
---Mike
**********************************************************************
Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike
Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400
Canada *
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>