Good Luck.
Don,
don@rdr.net
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Christian Schmit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We also become tired waiting for Lucent to fix their modem
> problems with the PM3. Can anyone give us an update
> on when we can expect to get our hands on a new and hopefully
> better working modem code for the PM3?? I do not need 3.9,
> I simply want a 3.8 working comos.
>
> Christian
>
>
> At 03:48 AM 4/8/99 , you wrote:
> >We have been evaluating for 30 days, Assured Access x1000 chasis with 96
> modems on 4 PRI's here in New Hampshire! They are sitting next to PM3's and
> the customer's who were having problems before, are not having anymore and
> we are getting less complaints now!
> >
> >I also can do much more with this box (for my needs) than I can with PM3!
> It is also cheaper as well!
> >
> >Anybody is interested in eval units, can get them for 30 days as well!
> >
> >Gent
> >Metro2000.Net
> >
> >
> >
> >At 05:29 PM 4/3/99 -0600, you wrote:
> >>> This is my take on the whole thing.. The fact that it works for MOST
> >>> people shows to me that the code obviously works. If the code was bad or
> >>> at fault here, we would ALL be having problems, therefore I can conclude
> >>> this is not the sole cause here.
> >>
> >> Sometimes it's the 1% of the people that's persistent that finds the
> >>root of the problem. I understand perfectly that in the perfect
> >>environment the PM3 is probably perfect. However what I am asserting is
> >>that in the real-world you're never going to get that perfect environment
> >>and I don't think the PM3 deals with some variations very well. Just
> >>because your PM3 works well enough for you in your environment doesn't
> >>mean that it's working well enough for me in my environment. And yes,
> >>some of us are actively investigating other vendors' equipment.
> >>
> >>> Most of us have a technical background, very related to scientific. Take
> >>> a look at this in that light. You say your compeitor gets clean connects
> >>> on his equipment. Has it occured to you that it is possible his line it
> >>> set up different, or his copper segment is cleaner?
> >>
> >> Has it occurred to you that many of so called "whiners" have a technical
> >>background as well? I will go out on a limb and say that I probably have
> >>*more* of a technical background than you do, but I am not trying to get
> >>into a pissing contest here and certainly I wouldn't be ignorant enough
> >>to say that automatically means any of my assertions is more valid than
> >>yours. If a customer calls and says he's having problems - I don't ask
> >>whether he's got a degree or not - I evaluate the evidence he has presented
> >>and try to take an educated guess.
> >>
> >>> Every problem we have expiereinced has been solveable with a little bit of
> >>> homework on the tech's end, and an init string or driver update.
> >>
> >> Nobody ever said we aren't doing this.
> >>
> >>> Please, kill the whining thread. Maybe someone should email lucent and
> >>> request a portmaster-whiners mailing list.
> >>
> >> If you don't like it, don't read it.
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> >>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> >>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 2000 Internet Services http://www.Metro2000.Net
> > 1 (603) 623-2002 Fax: 1 (603) 647-7576
> > Serving Northeast in NH, MA, ME, RI, CT, NY
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Affiliation given for identification not representation
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> >'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> >Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>