So much for trying to tweak that.
It still didn't do anything to explain to me why Lucent says our receive
level is lower than it optimally should be. GTE didn't give me any
explanations on that one, but the funny thing was they also didn't confirm
or deny the validity of Lucent's statement.
At 02:38 AM 4/8/99 -0700, MegaZone wrote:
>Once upon a time Sparky shaped the electrons to say...
>>Adding to Nicks question is there a way to change teh padding levels on the
>>pm3 themselves?
>
>No, the padding is on the telco switch and the NAS doesn't play a role in
>that.
>
>-MZ
>--
>-=*X I'm going down... under that is! <URL:http://www.aussie-isp.net/> X*=-
><URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer, me..
>Join ISP/C Internet Service Providers' Consortium <URL:http://www.ispc.org/>
>"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130
><URL:http://www.megazone.org/> <URL:http://www.gweep.net/> Hail Discordia!
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>