Just because you post a question doesn't mean it will be answered. This is
not an official support forum, and people just answer what they can as time
permits. If you need an answer, ask support@livingston.com.
In this case I'm not sure if it is possible to do what you are asking.
First read of the release notes makes me belive that you cannot do this with
the NAT/NAPT in ComOS as it stands. I asked about this when 3.9b8 was
released and never got an answer myself.
Basically what you'd want to do is create a NAPT map so that any requests to
port 80 from any IP, to any IP, are mapped to port 80 on your proxy instead.
And I don't see how one would do that with ComOS.
>The catch as I see it is my PM3 all acts as my gateway to the internet too(4
>x 64K ISDN). Because of that I need to watch out how it gets configured,
>because I don't want incoming www traffic from the internet to be forced
This makes it harder for you. If you weren't doing this you could just slap
the map on outbound traffic on ether0 and let everything be mapped. I suppose,
presuming one can even do this, what you'd do here is either assign it to the
user sessions inbound, or set it outbound on ether0 but be more careful in
what gets mapped - not mapping any requests that originate from IPs outside
of your network.
If ComOS can do this I'd really like to see an example posted - if not, it
definitely needs to be added to the NAT/NAPT code moving forward.
-MZ
-- <URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer, me.. Join ISP/C Internet Service Providers' Consortium <URL:http://www.ispc.org/> "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130 <URL:http://www.megazone.org/> <URL:http://www.gweep.net/> Hail Discordia! - To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>