Just wanted to Thank James and MegaZone for your help i did what you said
and now its working
THanks again
Bob Shivers
CEO Wizzards-Magick Net,Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of James
> Courtier-Dutton
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 1999 1:39 PM
> To: Bob Shivers; portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: RE: (PM) Am I loosing my mind(more detail)
>
>
> Yes.
>
> I am at a lose to understand where in the Lucent Manual it says you should
> enter a static route for the local ether0 subnet. I see lots of
> people doing
> this, and they should not.
> YOU SHOULD NEVER ENTER A STATIC ROUTE FOR THE LOCAL ETHER0 SUBNET.
> YOU SHOULD ONLY ENTER A STATIC ROUTE FOR NEXT HOB ROUTES TO A
> REMOTE SUBNET.
> Sorry for the shouting, but this really annoys me.
> Once you enter it, it is a pain to get rid off.
>
> Idiots guide to changing the ether0 IP address on any Lucent Portmaster
> product:-
> Example:-
> If your ether0 address is currently 10.10.10.1 with netmask 255.255.255.0
> and you wish to change it to 192.168.180.1 with netmask 255.255.255.0
> Plug into console port. (You don't have to, but it is easier sometimes)
> >set ether0 addr 192.168.180.1
> >set ether0 netmask 255.255.255.0 (you have to enter this, even
> if it does
> not change,this is the line which adjusts the routing table)
> >save all (Good Idea but no need for a reboot)
>
> The routing table will be changed to match the new IP address.
> The entry for the local subnet should always have flag "NL".
>
> NEVER do the following:-
> add route 192.168.180.0/24 192.168.180.1 1
>
> Now, the easiest way to get rid of the "NEVER DO" static route is as
> follows.
> >save all
> >erase file routes
> >reboot
>
> I hope this helps some people.
> Cheers
> James
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Bob Shivers
> > Sent: Sunday, April 18, 1999 06:17
> > To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> > Subject: (PM) Am I loosing my mind(more detail)
> >
> >
> > Has any one ever seen this before? (Sorry for the length of this)
> > we have several remote livingston routers on our network last week we
> > renumberd our entire network, here's what happened!
> >
> > we have an office router running ComOs 3.7.2L then I renumber the ether
> > interface and add route network address 209.40.64.128/25 router ether
> > address
> > 209.40.64.254 and met 1 (209.40.64.128/25 209.40.64.254 1) you
> can't reach
> > any host on the
> > new network but if you add route (209.40.64.128/25 209.40.64.132 1)
> > 209.40.64.132 is a term
> > server and delete route (209.40.64.128/25 209.40.64.254 1) the
> > network comes
> > up if you
> > change back to the old network it works as it should (old network
> > 208.151.231.0).and the same thing
> > happens on an IRX114 running ComOs 3.7.2 on a differnt network.
> > DETAILS:Livingston all ready up loaded new comos
> > rt1-kf> sh rout
> > Destination Mask Gateway Source Flag Met Interface
> > ----------------- ---- -------------------- ------- ---- --- ---------
> > 0.0.0.0 0 208.151.229.1 local NS 1 frmW1
> > 208.151.229.81 32 208.151.229.1 rip HD 3 frmW1
> > 208.151.229.97 32 208.151.229.1 rip HD 3 frmW1
> > 208.151.229.64 28 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 208.151.229.0 28 208.151.229.2 local NL 1 frmW1
> > 209.40.64.128 25 209.40.64.132 local NS 1
> > ether0 (this
> > is a local term server adding this rout was the only way we
> could bring up
> > network ?)
> > 209.40.72.0 24 209.40.64.130 local NS 1
> ether0 (TNT
> > DSLANT for DSL)
> > 209.40.74.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 209.40.69.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 208.234.221.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 209.40.66.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 206.100.190.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 208.205.192.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 207.48.101.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 198.68.27.0 24 208.151.229.1 rip ND 2 frmW1
> > 172.31.0.0 16 208.151.229.1 rip ND 9 frmW1
> >
> > rt1-kf> sh ether0
> > Ethernet Status: IP - Enabled IPX - Disabled
> >
> > Interface Addr: 209.40.64.254
> > Netmask: 255.255.255.128
> > Broadcast Address: 209.40.64.255
> >
> > IPX Network: 00000000
> > IPX Frame Type: ETHERNET_802.2
> > Ethernet Address: 00:**:05:**:24:**
> >
> > Routing: OSPF, RIP(Broadcast, Listen (On))
> > Input Filter:
> > Output Filter:
> >
> > rt1-kf> sh w1
> > ----------------------- Current Status - Port W1
> > ---------------------------
> > Status: ESTABLISHED
> > Input: 1157604386 Abort Errors: 48/16
> > Output: 350043855 CRC Errors: 100
> > Pending: 0 Overrun Errors: 0
> > TX Errors: 0 Frame Errors: 102
> > Modem Status: DCD+ CTS+
> >
> > Active Configuration Default Configuration
> > -------------------- ---------------------
> > Port Type: Netwrk Netwrk (Hardwired)
> > Line Speed: Ext 1536K Ext Clock
> > Modem Control: on on
> > Local Address: 208.151.229.2 208.151.229.2
> > Netmask: 255.255.255.240 255.255.255.240
> > Interface: frmW1 (FRM,Routing) (FRM,Routing)
> > Mtu: 1500 0
> > Dial Group: 0
> > LMI Poll Int: 10 (seconds)
> > Old DLCI List: 17:208.151.229.1
> >
> > rt1-kf> sh arp ether0
> > 209.40.64.129 at 00:**:05:**:95:**
> > 209.40.64.130 at 00:**:7b:**:63:**
> > 209.40.64.243 at 00:**:18:**:65:**
> > 209.40.64.244 at 00:**:05:**:c2:**
> > 209.40.64.132 at 00:**:05:**:3d:**
> >
> > rt1-kf> ver
> > Livingston PortMaster Office Router ComOS 3.7.2L
> > System uptime is 2 days 18 hours 41 minutes
> >
> > I know its been a long week but this dosent add up to me.
> >
> > thanks
> > Bob Shivers
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> > 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> > Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>