>As in: http://www.data.com/issue/990421/ras_figure2.html
>(story starts at http://www.data.com/issue/990421/ras.html)
>
>Of course, the argument is that a typical RAS never sees these load
>levels, but LE didn't point this out when their study of the PM3
>vs Ascend and 3Com worked in their favor.
Yowch....Lucent finished dead last in nearly every metric in that
article. I'd be interested in Lucent's response to this, especially the
91% call completion rate (which rings true...or no answer, I guess, with
what our users are telling us).
I like the box, but the study does raise some points.
-- Russ Taylor (http://www.cmc.net/~rtaylor/) CMC Tech Support Manager "Elvis didn't die, he just went home" -- K.- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>