>> [SNIP]
>>
>> No answer here, just a data point... Mine does it too. Seems to be
>> harmless, though. Perhaps within the scope of `sh sess,' spitting out the
>> info is more important than doing (waiting for) reverse on all of the
>> ports.
>
>ever heard of STFA (search the fine archives?) 8)
>
>The answer is that the PM grabs the DNS info quickly, if all don't resolve
>then it uses the IP addresses. When you redo the sh ses again the
>previous DNS info is already stored and the ones that weren't resolved are
>checked, thus filling in the DNS gaps.
>
Not only that, but in some cases (previous versions of the ComOS) if the
DNS names were over a certain character length, the PM would crash trying
to resolve the name.
jer
"On a day no different than the one now dawning, Leonardo drew the first
strokes of the Mona Lisa, Shakespeare wrote the first words of Hamlet, and
Beethoven began work on his Ninth Symphony." And Windows98 Crashed!
COMPAQ Class Action Law Suit: http://members.aol.com/CClass450/index.htm
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>