Re: DO NOT REDISTRIBUTE RADIUS 2.0 SOURCE CODE!

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Mon, 13 Jan 1997 14:59:08 -0700 (MST)

Hmm.. even though I don't see much of a point in restricting distribution
of the Radius 2.0 source code, it's better than Livingston not giving us
source code at all! So we should all follow the license agreement...

On Mon, 13 Jan 1997, John G. Thompson wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Jan 1997, MegaZone wrote:
> >
> > If you hack RADIUS 2.0 you may:
> >
> > Redistribute binary.
> > Redistribute diffs.
> >
> > YOU MAY NOT REDISTIRBUTE YOUR PATCHED SOURCE CODE. PERIOD.
> >
> > It has come to my attention that this is being done, please remove the
> > source voluntarily so that we don't have to take legal action and force it.
>
> For refernce, here's the license included in the radius 2.0 binaries and
> source
> --
> LIVINGSTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
>
> SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

<snip>

- Steve
- Systems Manager
- Community Internet Access, Inc.
- Gallup and Grants, New Mexico