Re: 2.0.0 / 2.0.6 problem ^_^;

Robert Hiltibidal (morgan@galactica.tekfront.com)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 11:45:21 -0600 (CST)

We've been running bsdi 2.1 for some time now. The only problenms we've
had is been finding a secure web servver...but for radius I'va had no
problems at all. In fact its been a lot smoother than NT and solaris
setups the competition has been using. Could it be you're experiencing
configuration problems?

Rob

Robert Hiltibidal Tek Frontiers
Tek Frontiers "Explore the possibilities.."
System Admin <http://www.tekfront.com>
morgan@tekfront.com (217)-241-5112

"People justify their computer for
business and education, but they
use their computer for FUN. " - Alex St John

On Fri, 17 Jan 1997, Peter Evans wrote:

> I just tried some of CG's mods to 2.0.0 radius on BSDi, the
> code seems happy enough considering that BSDi sucks doesnt it.
>
> using gcc 2.7.2 (not the archaic 1.42) and running it with
>
> /etc/radiusd -x
>
> Fri Jan 17 20:17:48 1997: [16241] auth: access-request from netserver1-tokyo (202.243.48.200) denied for unknown user iware
> Fri Jan 17 20:17:48 1997: [16241] Sending Reject of id 211 to netserver1-tokyo (202.243.48.200)
> Fri Jan 17 20:17:48 1997: [16242] auth: access-request from portmaster4 (202.243.51.11) denied for unknown user gman
> Fri Jan 17 20:17:48 1997: [16242] Sending Reject of id 76 to portmaster4 (202.243.51.11)
>
> it fails all users. at about 3/second ^_^;;
>
> after a quick "builddbm" and
>
> /etc/radiusd -x -b
>
> it works fine. which makes me wonder about just what he changed.
> FYI, untouched 2.0 works fine until it core-dumps for some other reason.
>
> Peter
> ----*
> 20 pm2's and 6 tc's ...
>
> oh, and for anti-usr types. tc's dont handle M$ dns automagically like pm's.
>
>
>
> --
> O_u \\ \\ Global OnLine Japan
> U \Beh! \\ \\ Engineering Dept
>
>
>