Majordomo result:

Old Man (oldman@mitec.net)
Tue, 4 Mar 1997 15:58:10 -0600 (CST)

Why is it everytime I try to post to this list I get garbage like this?
Is there something wrong with the mailing list? The message goes through
okay but I still this stuff. Thanks.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 13:47:52 -0800 (PST)
From: majordomo@livingston.com
To: oldman@mitec.net
Subject: Majordomo results: Re: Simultaneous logins

--

>>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 1997, Gary E. Miller wrote: **** Command 'on' not recognized. >>>> > > Can't one address the race conditions by waiting five minutes **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > > and checking to see if the one user is still logged into the **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > > same two ports? Or better yet, wait five minutes and then **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > > telnet into the PM's and show sessions; that will eliminate **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > > the lost-logoff problem. Since duplicates will be rare, **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > > the extra overhead of the telnet should be small (once per hour or so). **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > I have found that sometimes the PM2 thinks a user is still connected **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > but that is not so. Before kicking someone off I always ping the **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > connection to check that it is up. **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > That is why bpmtools only sends warning mail to duplicate users. **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > BTW, bpmtools uses the "secret" portmaster protocol to check who is **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > on. It seems much faster, and more reliable than running a psuedo **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> > telnet session. **** Command '>' not recognized. >>>> >>>> Are you sure about the speed, I have two versions of "pmwho", the only **** Command 'are' not recognized. >>>> using telnet is much faster than the one using bpmtools. **** Command 'using' not recognized. >>>> >>>> Also, I have never seen a user that has been shown as logged in on the **** Command 'also,' not recognized. >>>> portmaster when he/she was actually not. **** Command 'portmaster' not recognized. >>>> >>>> Sincerely, **** Command 'sincerely,' not recognized. >>>> Lee Kuo **** Command 'lee' not recognized. >>>> >>>> **** No valid commands found. **** Commands must be in message BODY, not in HEADER.

**** Help for majordomo:

This is Brent Chapman's "Majordomo" mailing list manager, version 1.93.

In the description below items contained in []'s are optional. When providing the item, do not include the []'s around it.

It understands the following commands:

subscribe [<list>] [<address>] Subscribe yourself (or <address> if specified) to the named <list>.

unsubscribe [<list>] [<address>] Unsubscribe yourself (or <address> if specified) from the named <list>.

get [<list>] <filename> Get a file related to <list>.

index [<list>] Return an index of files you can "get" for <list>.

which [<address>] Find out which lists you (or <address> if specified) are on.

who [<list>] Find out who is on the named <list>.

info [<list>] Retrieve the general introductory information for the named <list>.

lists Show the lists served by this Majordomo server.

help Retrieve this message.

end Stop processing commands (useful if your mailer adds a signature).

Commands should be sent in the body of an email message to "majordomo"or to "<list>-request".

The <list> parameter is only optional if the message is sent to an address of the form "<list>-request".

Commands in the "Subject:" line NOT processed.

If you have any questions or problems, please contact "majordomo-owner".