I didn't find any info about y2k compliance when I was surfing livingston's
homepage.
So. can anybody fix this issue whether Radius 2.01 compliance or not?
Rgds,
Yohannes A Sulistyono__________________________________________
Internet Service Dept., PT Aplikanusa Lintasarta, Menara Thamrin 12th Floor
Jl. MH Thamrin kav 3, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia. Mailto : aries@idola.net.id
Phone. +6221-2302345 ext. 1157/1284, Fax. +6221-2303883
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Waterman <nick-ls@leonet.co.uk>
To: portmaster-radius@livingston.com <portmaster-radius@livingston.com>
Date: Miércoles, Abril 15, 1998 03:25 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIUS) Millenium Bug
>Yohannes A Sulistyono said:
>> Hi there,
>> Is Radius 2.01 compliant with Y2K?
>
>I don't know about yours, but my logfiles seem to contain 4-digit
>years, AND unix "Timestamp" entries which have their own entirely
>different 2038 problem, but no 2000 problem.
>
>--
>Nick Waterman. Network Consultant / Sysadmin - LEOnet
>Beating tomorrow's technology into submission.
>nick-sig@leonet.co.uk Team *AMIGA*!
>An Englishman never enjoys himself, except for a noble purpose.
>
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>'unsubscribe portmaster-radius' in the body of the message.
>Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-radius' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>