Re: RA6300 vs PM-3

Roger Marquis (marquis@roble.com)
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 21:31:04 -0700 (PDT)

MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com> wrote:
>3. We support more ISDN switch types (not really an issue in US)

Can you tell us which switch types?

>5. We will support 33.6 V.34+ calls, they do 28.8 V.34

Hopefully the modems will try to negotiate 28.8 _before_ 33.6. Those
non-ITU protocols have always cause headaches during the initial handshake.

>6. I don't see any provision for data compression on ISDN - we have a
>daughter card coming out that will do compression.

Compression, great! With Ascend, Cisco, or just other Livingstons?

>7. TCP/IP and IPX are standard on all of our units, with the RA6300 you
>have TCP/IP only or the 'Enterprise' set which is everything (for more
>money, of course)

How many Livingston customers use IPX? Are legacy protocols realy worth
the effort to support and promotion?

>8. We use DSPs for a full digital path, they have microcom analog modem
>cards.

A desireable feature to be sure but what I'd really like to know is how fast
these modems connect, how do they hold a noisy line, will they retrain up as
well as down, and how good is their interoperability with the other
popular modems (USR, Microcom, etc).

>9. OSPF is in beta now for the Livingston product family - are they doing
>it? (Serious question, it isn't mentioned.) They do RIPv2, we don't to
>be fair.

Beta schmeata, IMHO :-)

>11. With the PM you get integral support for the industry standard - RADIUS.

Speaking of which, when (if ever) will RADIUS be a real RFC.

Roger Marquis
Sr. Systems Analyst, Roble Systems
(marquis@roble.com, 415-494-9250)