The only question I can't find an answer to is comparing the Ascend
bandwidth - on - demand and the PM3.
Will the PM3 add/drop channels like the Ascend, or is the MPP support
only enough to allow 2 B's on the initial call, and it can't drop
the 2nd channel?
My only concern about the PM3 is it's new. And UUNet and MSN
use MAX's...
On the otherhand, my Livingston equipment *never* needs to be
rebooted and is the most stable equipment I own.
And the PM3 is a more reasonable price-per-port, as you explained
quite nicely.
Damn, decisions, decisions....
richg
___________________________________________________________________
Richard W. Gross | voice 310-823-3308
BeachNet Internet Access | fax 310-823-1390
http://www.beachnet.com | Virtual Domain Hosting
richg@beachnet.com | Dialup PPP/USR v.34 locked 115k
On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, MegaZone wrote:
> Once upon a time Ing. Felipe Tribaldos shaped the electrons to say...
> >I write from Panama. There is no such thing as
> >channelized T1/E1 here, much less ISDN. Does this mean that we can't use
> >a PM3? Are the PM2 going to be discontinued like the PM11?
>
> Yes it means you won't be able to use a PM-3. But the PM-2 is not being
> discontinued.
>
> >ISDN using the S/T standard should be available sometime next year,
> >but who knows. INTEL, the local PTT is quite slow getting thins done.
>
> You could use the PM-2i-S/T, PM-2ei-S/T, MOD-10I-S/T and OR-S/T then for ISDN
> with BRI S/T.
>
> -MZ
> --
> Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
> Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
> For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/>
> Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
> See me in person: Internet Expo, Boston, MA, October 16-17, Booth 422 ;-)
>