Re: PM3 + SNMP

David Carmean (dlc@silcom.com)
Thu, 26 Sep 1996 20:32:07 -0700 (PDT)

In a previous message, Peter Evans wrote:
>
> MegaZone didst scribe thus:
>

>
> | Let us know what you want, and for those who really want SNMP and haven't
> | asked for it - Ask for it! (Not on the list please, I'm sure everyone doesn't
> | want to read that. Send it to sales@livingston.com - although the discussion
> | of what it desired might work here...)
>
> who's logged in on which port would be really nice.

CPU load, CPU load, and CPU load!!!!!!

(most useful for IRXs and such...)

On my brand "C" routers, when I have a performance problem, I
can fire up Tkined and find out why. That, and multiple Frame-Relay
subinterfaces, are the main reasons I'm not buying IRXs right now.

(Multiple "point-to-point" subnets solve the problem of treating a
non-meshed frame network as if it were a broadcast network...making
it possible for RIP to work correctly on the frame cloud.)

Oh yeah, and BGP and VLSM/OSPF, but I know you're working
on those.

-- 
David Carmean           WB6YZM          DC574           <dlc@silcom.com>
        System/Network Administration, Silicon Beach Communications
Unsolicited commercial e-mail not accepted.  Violators will be LARTed.