Re: Pm3.3.2c1 upgrade (fwd)

MegaZone (megazone@livingston.com)
Fri, 27 Sep 1996 19:53:10 -0700 (PDT)

Once upon a time Rich Adamson shaped the electrons to say...
>it is highly likely the change in NVRAM configurations was not "planned"
>but rather the result of insufficient pre-release testing. Its

WRONG.

It WAS planned. 3.3.2 and up address NEW HW layouts in the PM-2i and PM-2ei
units - they have a C0 port. This necessitated some changes to the data
structures.

>See my response above. You already know it wasn't "planned". Add to

No, you ASSUMED it wasn't planned. And you are wrong.

>that the very significant list of serious problems with PMconsole for
>Windows, and you can guess at production release objectives/deadline
>issues within the company.

And be completely off base.

And what "very significate list of serious problems with PMconsole for
Windows"? We hardly get any error reports with PMconsole for Windows 1.1,
which has been out for a long time now. It does have a couple of bugs,
but none I am aware of are 'very significant' or 'serious'.

-MZ

--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway  #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
See me in person: Internet Expo, Boston, MA, October 16-17, Booth 422 ;-)