Re: PM-3 doesn't do BRI, solution.

Paul M Mockett Jr (pauljr@seanet.com)
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:31:39 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 30 Sep 1996, kadokev@ripco.com (Kevin Kadow) wrote:

> I understand _why_ Livingston has chosen not to implement BRI support
> on the PM-3, unfortunately the tariffs in many areas make PRI prohibitively
> expensive. In the Chicago area, from Ameritech or MFS it's 2-2.5x as much
> as the equivalent number of BRIs.

In Seattle, USWest charges over 5x more for PRI than 12 BRI's (and you
get the extra channel).

> Competition for local business dialtone should eventually drive the price
> down. PRI service is technically simpler than multiple BRIs, the cost
> to the local loop provider is about as low as you can go, the CPE does
> all the hard work.

> Livingston should research whether anybody is or will develop a product
> to aggregrate a number of BRIs and present them to a PM-3 (or Ascend,etc)
> as a 'virtual PRI'. Yes, you can do this now with a micro 5ESS, but
> that's expensive overkill.

> The actual hardware cost for such a beast would actually be pretty
> minimal, perhaps with a street price of $2K or less.

I would be willing to pay as much as 2 months savings or $3500 per PRI
generated in order to save $35000/mo and user the PM3! And $2k would be
even better!

> E.g. it could accept 11 BRI circuits and present them as a 22 PRI
> B channels, or turn 15 into an E1.

> I'd buy one.

I would buy 20! (and enjoy teaching USWorst the folly of 'premium
pricing'; thats their excuse for why they charge more for a service that
costs less.)

Paul M Mockett Jr
Seanet Online Services
701 Fifth Ave, Suite 6801
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 343-7828