Re: FreeBSD 2.1.5 RADIUS 2.0 ? (fwd)

Stephen Fisher (lithium@cia-g.com)
Sun, 27 Oct 1996 08:52:18 -0700 (MST)

Does it really matter which linux kernel it is based on? Aren't the
binaries for all of them basically the same?

On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Jon Lewis wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, MegaZone wrote:
>
> > The Linux version was done on 1.2.13 ELF - which is probably the most widely
> > used and distributed Linux release in the world today. All the major
> > Linux distributions are based on 1.2.13 ELF.
> >
> > There are 1.3.x kernels, but as any Linux hacker knows, 1.odd.x are the
> > experimental kernels, and 1.even.x are the 'stable' ones. Running any
> > odd numbered builds on a production machine is crazy.
>
> I think Megazone needs to get out more often. Most Linux distributions
> these days come with a 2.0.x kernel...that's right, the next stable
> release series is out...and has been for about 5 months. They've even
> started on 2.1.x...the next development series already.
>
> > 1.2.13 is what everyone wanted. And it is better than 1.2.3 QMAGIC, which
> > is what we built things on last time.
>
> Not me. I'll wait for the source before trying radiusd 2.0. I use 2.0.x
> kernels and a.out libs.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
> Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
> ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
>