Re: BGP/4

patrick@value.net
Fri, 6 Dec 1996 08:24:04 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Captain Scarlet wrote:

> > then to US. Well, this Cisco works with BGP/4, but we have to upgrade
> > its memory to 64 MB to do that. Yesterday, we realized that our cisco
>
> 64 megs? Gack!
>
> > Does IRX-211 works with BGP/4 ??? If its not, what can i do ???
>
> Nope, BGP(4) isn't supported... yet.
>
> (Actually, I don't know offhand if the IRX will, but I know it's being
> developed for the PM3.)

Just an observation, but it would seem a little silly to have to go buy a
Terminal Server/Router combo, just to get the Router portion.

Would this mean that Livingston is doing away with it's dedicated
router(IRX)? Or is an IRX-NCC-1701-E(Star Trek geeks will know....) is
waiting in the wings?

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (510) 943-5769 voice
Systems Administrator (510) 210-2000 modem
Value Net, Inc. (510) 943-1708 fax
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/